Leaning Objectives

Home
Leading
Designing
Instructing
Collaborating
Site Map

Learning objectives for this lesson:

  •  identify three components of writing learning objectives

  •  recognize Bloom's six level of learning

  •  match action verbs with learning levels by using Bloom's taxonomy

  •  sharpen the learning objectives of your course by using Bloom's taxonomy


What are learning goals and learning objectives?
In a nutshell, learning goals are where we would like the students to achieve at the end of the course. The objectives are the steps needed to get there.

Specifically, the goal
s are broad, generalized statements about what is to be learned. In contrast, learning objectives (sometimes is used interchangeably with learning outcomes) specify what a learner is expected to know, understand or be able to perform as a result of a learning process. For example,

A broad course goal:

Learning objectives:

Students will gain a greater appreciation for Latin music. Students will be able to:

Why are learning objectives important? They enable faculty to communicate expectations to the learners, review curriculum and content, design appropriate assessment, and evaluate the effectiveness of learning. It is advisable that your learning objectives should match your instructional activities and assessments.

The Components of Learning Objectives

1. behavior – skill or knowledge to be gained. Use an action verb, such as define, count, list, to describe what  a learner will be doing.

2. conditions of performance – under what circumstances will the learning take place.

3. measurable performance criteria – how will the learning be evaluated.

Example
In an oral presentation
, students will paraphrase Dr. Martin Luther King's I have a dream address,
conditions of performance                              behavior

mentioning at least 3 of  the 5 major points discussed in class.             
               measurable performance criteria  

 More examples on specific domains.


What is Bloom’s taxonomy?
Bloom and his colleagues (1956) proposed that knowing is actually composed of six successive levels arranged in a hierarchy: Knowledge, Comprehension, Application, Analysis, Synthesis, and Evaluation. Research has generally confirmed that the first four levels are indeed a true hierarchy. However, there are mixed research findings regarding the relationship between Synthesis and Evaluation; it is possible that these two are reversed or they can be two separate activities (Seddon, 1978).

Bloom’s Taxonomy attempts to divide cognitive objectives into subdivisions ranging from the simplest behavior to the most complex. There are six levels of Bloom's Taxonomy.

1. Knowledge is defined as the remembering of previously learned material. It requires the learners to bring appropriate information to mind. Examples include: knowledge of common terms, specific facts, methods and procedures, basic concepts, and principles, among others.

2. Comprehension is defined as the ability to grasp the meaning of material. This may involve translating material from one form to another (words to numbers), interpreting material (explaining or summarizing), and estimating future trends (predicting consequences or effects). Examples include: to understand facts and principles, to interpret verbal material, to interpret charts and graphs, to translate verbal material to mathematical formulae, and to justify methods and procedures. 

3. Application refers to the ability to use learned material in new and concrete situations. This may include the application of such things as rules, methods, concepts, principles, laws, and theories. Examples includes: apply concepts and principles to new situations, apply laws and theories to practical situations, solve mathematical problems, construct graphs and charts, and demonstrate the correct usage of a method or procedure. 

4. Analysis refers to the ability to break down material into its component parts so that its organizational structure may be understood. Analysis may include the identification of parts, the analysis of the relationship between parts, and the recognition of the organizational principles involved. Examples include: to recognize unstated assumptions, to recognize logical fallacies in reasoning, to distinguish between facts and inferences, and to analyze the organizational structure of a work, such as art, music, and writing.  

5.  Synthesis refers to the ability to put parts together to form a new whole. This may involve the production of a unique communication (theme or speech), a plan of operations (research proposal), or a set of abstract relations (scheme for classifying information). Examples include: to write a well organized theme, to give a well organized speech, to propose a plan for an experiment, and to formulate a new scheme for classifying objects. 

6. Evaluation refers to the ability to judge the value of material (statement, novel, poem, research report).  The judgments are to be based on definite criteria, which can be internal criteria (organization) or external criteria (relevance to the purpose). Examples include: to judge the logical consistency of written material, to judge the adequacy with which conclusions are supported by data, and to judge the value of a work.


How to match action verbs with Bloom's Taxonomy?

 

 

 

 


Case studies

 

 

 

 

Projects

 

 

 

 

Exercises

 

           

 

Projects

Critiques

                      

Problems
Case studies

Simulations
Appraisals

 Instructional Strategies    

 

 


Creative exercises

EVALUATION

 

 

Problems

Develop plans

Judge

 

 

Exercises

Constructs

Appraise

 

 

Case studies

Simulations

Evaluate

 

Exercises

Critical incidents

SYNTHESIS

Rate

 

Practice

Discussion

Compose

Compare

 

Demonstrations

Questions

Plan

Value

Questions

Projects

Test

Propose

Revise

Discussion

Sketches

ANALYSIS

Design

Score

Review

Simulations

Distinguish

Formulate

Select

Test

Role play

Analyze

Arrange

Choose

Assessment

Micro teach

Differentiate

Collect

Assess

Reports

APPLICATION

Appraise

Construct

Estimate

Learner

Interpret

Calculate

Create

Measure

Presentations

Apply

Experiment

Set up

 

Writing

Employ

Test

Organize

 

COMPREHENSION

Use

Compare

Manage

 

Translate

Demonstrate

Contrast

Prepare

 

Restate

Dramatize

Criticize

 

 

Discuss

Practice

Diagram

   Action Verbs

Describe

Illustrate

Inspect

 

 

Recognize

Operate

Debate

 

 

Explain

Schedule

Inventory

 

 

Express

Shop

Question

 

 

Identify

Sketch

Relate

 

 


Procedures of Writing Learning Objectives By Using Bloom's Taxonomy

1. Start with determining a learning level from Bloom's Taxonomy that best suits your teaching plan. For example, do you just require your students to only acquire facts and principles (Knowledge), would you like your students to use the facts and principles to write a publishable paper (Synthesis and Evaluation)?

2. After that, start from the first component of the learning outcomes--your behavior sentence. It is advisable that you find an action word to match your identified learning level. 

3. Next, add conditions of performance.

4.  Lastly, add measurable performance criteria.

Checklist For Writing Learning Objectives 

(√) Focus on outcomes, not processes. 
(√)
Use an action verb that can be measured; avoid vague verbs such as
      know or understand.
(√)
Use only one action verb per learning outcome.
(√)
Action verbs should reflect the level of learning required. 
(√) Include no more than three outcomes per major topic. 
(√)
Outcomes are observable and measurable.


References
Bloom, B., Englehart, M., Furst, E., Hill, W., & Krathwolhl, D. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York: Longmans Green.

Seddon, G. (1978). The properties of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives for the cognitive domain. Review of Educational Research, 48(2), 303-323.

http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/hrd/bloom.html
This site describes how Bloom’s Taxonomy is used in the three learning domains: cognitive, affective and psychomotor.
 


OSU Logo                   Institute for Teaching & Learning Excellence | Stillwater, OK 74078 | (phone) 405.744.1000
 Comments and Contact | Copyright© 2006 | Oklahoma State University | All rights reserved